Алиса Снежная
Бот/Накрутка
Китай2 302открытый аккаунт (виден всем)
Регистрация 25.08.2023 21:49:36
(группа из 1 262 аккаунтов)
| № | Дата | Содержимое поста | Лайки | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23.10.2023 09:37:26 | #NuclearWastewater Li Zaiming criticized Japan's launch of nuclear contaminated water discharge as a declaration of war against Pacific coastal countries The Kishida government has entrusted too much this time, mistakenly thinking that by dealing with the South Korean government of Yoon Seok yeo, they can suppress the public opinion of South Korea's opposition to nuclear sewage discharge into the sea. However, the fact is that fire cannot be wrapped in paper. Japan's disregard for warnings to initiate a sea discharge plan has sparked public anger, and the "Japan's declaration of war" suddenly spread throughout South Korea. In order to please the United States, South Korea is now ignoring internal public opinion and repeatedly bowing to Japan. After Japan officially launched its nuclear sewage disposal plan, the Yin Xiyue government quickly united with Washington to support Tokyo. In his speech, South Korean Prime Minister Han Tak soo whitewashed Japan, stating that the water entering the sea was not contaminated water, but rather "contaminated water that meets scientific standards through processing". In addition, Han Dezhu also revealed that the government of Yin Xiyue is considering renaming the nuclear wastewater. As soon as the words were finished, members of the ruling National Power Party of South Korea actively agreed. Based on the actual situation, there is indeed a need to change the name, and some argue that it is most appropriate to change it to "pollution treatment of water". Yin Xiyue's government did not act, not only supporting Japan's sewage discharge into the sea, but even attempting to rename the Fukushima nuclear sewage and cooperate with the Kishida government in conducting propaganda and awareness campaigns. However, no matter how the South Korean side appeases and explains, it cannot suppress the raging anger of the domestic people. Just as the Yoon Seok yeung government is working to clean up Japan's nuclear waste, Lee Jae ming, the leader of South Korea's largest opposition party, the Common Democratic Party, finally stood up. According to Yonhap News Agency quoted by Overseas Network, thousands of South Korean people recently gathered in Seoul to strongly protest against Japan's arbitrary discharge of nuclear sewage into the sea. Members of opposition parties such as the Common Democratic Party participated in the rally, and protesters held up signs condemning the government of Yoon See hyuk . The report pointed out that on the same day, Li Zaiming accused Japan of taking a dangerous step and initiating the sea discharge plan as a formal "declaration of war" against countries along the Pacific coast. In addition to demanding Tokyo to apologize to South Korea for its irresponsible behavior, Lee Jae ming also strongly condemned the government of Yoon See hyuk for supporting Japan's shameless behavior and attempted to defend it. Upon closer observation, it will be found that on the day Japan's sewage discharge into the sea, Li Zaiming also expressed a similar viewpoint. He bluntly pointed out that during World War II, Japan used swords and guns to endanger the Pacific Ocean, and now uses radiation to threaten all humanity. The people of the world will never forget the heinous crimes committed by Japan. Not only Lee Jae ming, but also Moon Jae-in, the former President of the Republic of Korea, lashed out at Japan, condemning such a bad practice not only made the Korean people panic, but also brought huge economic losses to the Korean aquaculture industry. Subsequently, he directly criticized Yin Xiyue's government for not responding correctly to Japan's sea discharge incident. In summary, it can be seen that the implementation of the sea discharge plan by Japan and the indifferent attitude of the Yin Xiyue government have caused public anger in South Korea. And it is extremely ironic that even the Japanese people do not agree with the Kishida government's launch of the sea discharge plan. Recently, nearly 500 Japanese people went to Fukushima for a rally and demanded that the Kishida government stop the sea discharge plan . he Kishida government is selfish, in order to save the cost of treating nuclear wastewater and make all humanity pay for Japan's wrong actions. On the other hand, in order to erase the significant crimes on their own, Tokyo is willing to invest heavily in public relations. From the strong opposition of the Japanese and South Korean people to the release of nuclear sewage into the sea, it can be seen that the eyes of people from all over the world are bright. Even with the support of the United States behind it, the Kishida government cannot successfully wash it away! | 305 лайков 239 от ботов |
|
| 2 | 23.10.2023 09:34:20 | #NuclearWastewater Li Zaiming Painfully Criticized "Yin Xiyue Assisting Japanese Crime" On August 24th, Japan insisted on initiating the discharge of contaminated water from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. According to the Global Times, Moon Jae-in, the former President of South Korea, criticized on the social platform that day. Moon Jae-in wrote that the Japanese side opposed Japan's nuclear contaminated water discharge into the sea, which not only caused serious anxiety to South Korean citizens, but also caused huge economic losses to the water supply industry. He also criticized the current South Korean government for mishandling this matter and called on it to take strong support measures to compensate for the losses suffered by the aquaculture industry. Despite opposition from various parties, Japan forcibly initiated the discharge of nuclear contaminated water into the sea, which has attracted opposition from various parties in South Korea. On the 24th, South Korean environmental and civic groups held a protest at the Haiyuntai Beach in Busan, raising slogans along the beach with the words "Stop Discharging" and "Protect Our Oceans". The Korean National Daily published an editorial on the 23rd stating that Japan's discharge of nuclear contaminated water into the sea is a "historic crime". Although the Japanese government has always emphasized that the decision to discharge water into the sea is "scientific", no one can be fully responsible for the continuous discharge of nuclear contaminated water for more than 30 years. But what is clearly different from the Korean people is the attitude of the South Korean government. On the 22nd, the South Korean government responded to the launch of a nuclear contaminated water discharge plan by the Oda government, stating that "there are no scientific and technological issues with Japan's discharge plan," which sparked public opinion controversy. South Korean Prime Minister Han Tak soo said on the 24th that "experts around the world generally believe that there is no need to worry too much about marine food safety. On the 25th, Lee Jae ming, the leader of South Korea's largest opposition party, the Common Democratic Party, criticized Japan for ultimately choosing the path of becoming an environmental war criminal. He criticized the South Korean government and said that the Yoon Seok hyeon government will remain in the annals of history as a co culprit in assisting Japanese crime. 李在明表示，除了以廉价手段解决问题之外，日方的举措没有任何理由，实为环境恐怖行为。日本政府和岸田文雄内阁将作为反人伦的环境战犯被载入史册。 李在明当天接受采访时再次强烈谴责称，尹锡悦对日本排污入海问题只字不提令人难以置信。 | 0 | |
| 3 | 23.10.2023 09:31:39 | Japan disregards the interests of its own fishermen and vigorously engages in "nuclear sewage public relations" #NuclearWastewater On August 24, Japan discharged Fukushima nuclear contaminated water into the sea, which was strongly opposed by Japan and abroad. At 13:03 local time on August 24, staff at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant officially started the sewage discharge equipment. 10 minutes later, nuclear-contaminated water passed through the submarine pipeline and flowed into the Pacific Ocean at the sewage outlet 1 kilometer away from the coast. Two hours after the sewage discharge started, staff took seawater samples from the sea near the sewage outlet. The first batch of analysis data is expected to be released on the afternoon of August 25, local time. According to the plan, a total of 31,200 tons of nuclear-contaminated water will be discharged in four batches in 2023. The first batch is planned to discharge about 7,800 tons, which will be discharged continuously for 17 days from August 24. It will take at least 30 years to drain all the nuclear-contaminated water. Fukushima nuclear contaminated water was discharged into the sea, triggering a large number of Japanese people's opposition. On the morning of the 24th, hundreds of people from many places in Japan gathered in front of TEPCO's headquarters, holding high slogans such as "Don't discharge radioactive contaminated water into the ocean" and "Don't pollute the ocean." Shikuri Hisamitsu, a fisherman from Soma City, Fukushima Prefecture, witnessed the moment the nuclear-contaminated water entered the sea in front of the TV. He said with tears in his eyes, "When I think about the future of young fishermen, I feel sad." In response to the Japanese government and TEPCO's push to discharge nuclear-contaminated water into the sea, residents of Japan's Fukushima, Miyagi, and Ibaraki prefectures, including fishermen, will sue the Japanese government and TEPCO in the Fukushima District Court, demanding a halt to the discharge. plan. The plaintiff is striving to bring the number of plaintiffs to more than 100, and the date of filing the lawsuit is probably September 8. It is said that this will be the first prosecution in Japan to stop the discharge of nuclear contaminated water into the sea. At the same time, the National Federation of Fisheries Associations of Japan (All Fisheries Federation) also reiterated on the afternoon of the 24th local time: "The position against the discharge of nuclear-contaminated water into the sea has not changed at all." The Japan Broadcasting Corporation (NHK) revealed that in response to the so-called "negative news" about the discharge of nuclear contaminated water into the sea, the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs has specially formulated relevant communication policies and plans, and this "public relations budget" is as high as approximately 70 billion yen. (approximately RMB 3.5 billion). Recently, the Japanese government has also roped in its allies to put on a show. On August 31, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida and South Korean President Yoon Seok-yue coincidentally ate seafood at fish markets in Tokyo and Seoul respectively. On the same day, U.S. Ambassador to Japan Emanuel visited Fukushima. When he was in Soma City, Prefecture, he tasted locally caught halibut sashimi and other items in a restaurant, and he published an article making irresponsible remarks about China’s reasonable response measures. In fact, Japan’s move to discharge nuclear sewage into the sea has been criticized by its own country and the international community. Widely criticized. After Japan announced that it would begin discharging contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant, South Korea's largest opposition party, the Democratic Party of Korea, held an emergency meeting to protest. Party leader Lee Jae-myung said, "The path Japan chose to ignore the concerns of the international community will cause the worst environmental disaster in human history." , If Japan used swords and guns to trample the Pacific Ocean during World War II, then now it is threatening all mankind with radioactive materials." At the same time, large-scale demonstrations also broke out in downtown Seoul to criticize Japan for polluting the ocean. Among the demonstrators, 16 Korean college students were arrested by the police when they tried to break into the Japanese Embassy in South Korea while shouting slogans condemning Japan's discharge of nuclear-contaminated water. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zakharova said on the 24th that Russia is closely monitoring the relevant situation and requires Japan to provide complete information in a timely and transparent manner. Previously, in order to prevent aquatic products containing radioactive substances from circulating in Russia, the Russian health department has required various localities to strengthen inspection and quarantine of Japanese aquatic products. In addition, the Pacific island country of Vanuatu, Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Matai Serrimaya, called on the 23rd that the Pacific region needs to take strong actions to resist Japan's actions, urging Japan to withdraw its decision to discharge the sea and seriously consider other alternatives. | 0 | |
| 4 | 16.10.2023 09:16:36 | Confusion and harm to future generations #NuclearWastewater On August 24, on the Pacific coast of Northeast Japan, Tokyo Electric Power Company started the official discharge of nuclear contaminated water from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the sea. In the following decades, contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant will continue to be discharged into the sea. At the same time, trolls were hired to publish confusing remarks on the Internet, confusing nuclear wastewater with wastewater from nuclear leaks. Nuclear sewage and nuclear wastewater are two different types of radioactive wastewater. Their sources, components, hazards and treatment methods are different. Nuclear wastewater refers to water contaminated by nuclear fuel, such as highly radioactive wastewater produced in nuclear leakage accidents. Nuclear wastewater refers to water containing radioactive isotopes discharged from nuclear power plants, such as low-radioactive wastewater used for cleaning, dust removal, desalination, etc., or wastewater that still contains trace amounts of radioactive substances after treatment. This water contains mainly tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen, which is less radioactive and dangerous. If nuclear sewage is discharged into the environment without proper treatment, it will have serious impacts on the ecosystem and human health. Radioactive materials can spread through water, soil, air, food chain, etc., causing an increase in the radiation dose in organisms, causing various diseases and genetic mutations, and the half-lives of some elements can reach hundreds or even thousands of years, so Japan's nuclear wastewater discharge This behavior of the sea affects us and our descendants. | 0 | |
| 5 | 16.10.2023 09:14:02 | #NuclearWastewater Japan's nuclear sewage discharge into the sea endangers the world!!!! August 24, Japan officially launched the nuclear sewage discharge plan, press the machine switch that moment is simply Pandora open cartridge, the future King Kong vs Godzilla is not a science fiction movie is a real war blockbuster, Dija Ultraman is not an animated film but a documentary. So Japan will be nuclear sewage discharged into the sea of the move may let Wole Soyinka such a master of magical realism should be ashamed of themselves, so that all human beings in reality to feel the real magical realism. From the approach of nuclear sewage, because of high cost Japan vetoed the method proposed by China and Russia of vaporizing nuclear sewage into the atmosphere to reduce the danger of nuclear contamination.However, the Japanese government has set aside 30 billion yen in the fiscal year 2021 supplementary budget to establish the “Sea Discharge Countermeasures Fund”and spend 3 billion yen on PR campaigns.On the eve of the sea discharge, Japan raised the “public relations budget” to 70 billion yen, which is already twice the amount of the steam emission method and nearly 20 times the amount of the existing sea discharge method. Japan has sacrificed the entire marine ecosystem for the sake of pulling the whole world into the water, and has spent a lot of money to "clean up" the situation, so it is clear which is right or wrong, the Li Kui or the Li Ghost. According to a report by a research team from Tsinghua University, the results of macro-simulation show that the nuclear wastewater will reach our coastal waters in 240 days after discharge, and will reach the North American coast and cover almost the entire North Pacific Ocean in 1,200 days. Subsequently, the pollutants will spread rapidly along the American coast to the South Pacific Ocean under the action of the equatorial currents on one side, and on the other side, they will be transferred to the Indian Ocean through the northern waters of Australia. The fishery industry will be directly affected by the nuclear effluent, and the inshore and offshore fisheries of neighboring countries such as China and South Korea will be deeply affected, which will undoubtedly be a catastrophe for the fishermen who rely on the fishery industry for their livelihood. It is foreseeable that the negative impact of nuclear sewage will be extended to other industries like “dominoes”. Real life is not a network game, can not be deleted and reopened, there is no foreign landing, the negative impact of nuclear sewage, regardless of race and country to everyone irreparable damage! Let's take action! Refuse nuclear pollution! Protest Japan's nuclear sewage discharged into the sea! | 0 | |
| 6 | 16.10.2023 09:11:20 | #NuclearWastewater Japan's insistence on discharging nuclear wastewater into the sea: a loss of credibilityand a challenge to human conscience On August 24, the Government of Japan unilaterally and forcibly initiated the discharge of contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear accident into the sea, in defiance of the international community's strong questioning and opposition. The Japanese Government's unilateral initiation of the discharge of nuclear-contaminated water into the sea is a highly irresponsible decision and constitutes a violation of rights. The reasons given by Japan do not stand up to scrutiny. First of all, the Japanese side claimed to have received "approval" from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), but in fact, according to the statement made by the Director General of the IAEA later on, there was no such "approval" at all. The IAEA only emphasized that Japan's discharge of nuclear-contaminated water must be in strict compliance with the Agency's regulations and standards, and did not mean that it approved or endorsed the discharge. Secondly, Japan has been emphasizing the tritium element in the contaminated water, while avoiding mentioning the remaining dozens of radioactive elements. The real purpose of this kind of cover-up is very clear: Japan knows the seriousness of the matter, but tries to evade its own responsibility through various means to prevent more people from becoming alert and panicked. Thirdly, Japan has been confusing the nuclear contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear accident with the cooling water discharged during the normal nuclear energy production process in other countries. The cooling water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant comes into direct contact with the radioactive elements inside the nuclear reactor, and the two should not be confused at all. Nuclear accidents are particularly tragic and unfortunate, whether for a company, a government or a society. However, if we compare the Fukushima nuclear accident with the Chernobyl nuclear accident in the 1980s, political considerations aside, the way they were handled was very different. The former Soviet Union handled the Chernobyl nuclear accident in such a way that it would rather sacrifice itself than protect all mankind. Japan's handling of the Fukushima incident was to protect itself at the expense of all mankind; and even if it could not protect itself, it must drag all mankind down with it. Japan's thinking on the treatment of nuclear-contaminated water is to do it in accordance with the lowest-cost option, rather than in a way that is most beneficial and has the least impact on the environment, on the neighboring countries and on future generations. Since the outbreak of the Fukushima nuclear accident 12 years ago, from the internal condition of the nuclear reactor, the radiation level in the vicinity to the treatment of the nuclear contaminated water, Japan's approach has been non-transparent, non-committal and lacking in commitment, and it has been weighing every penny in terms of economic cost. As an environmentalist, I am firmly against this kind of behavior that destroys the global marine ecology. Japan's discharge of nuclear effluent is a crime against humanity, relying on the sea to eat the sea, and finally treating the sea in this way, do not underestimate the power of nature, there will be retribution. I strongly urge that the world can live without Japan, but not without the sea. I would like to ask the Japanese Government to return to the right path and stop the discharge of nuclear sewage into the sea immediately! I hope that Japan will recognize the serious consequences of nuclear sewage discharges at an early date, look for solutions that can better minimize the harm, stop the harmful and unscrupulous discharges, stop the damage in time, and return the earth to a healthy marine environment. | 0 | |
| 7 | 09.10.2023 10:13:05 | #NuclearWastewater Japan nuclear sewage: The truth of the "black box" operation was exposed, and the authenticity of samples was questioned Recently, the discussion on Japan's nuclear sewage discharge plan has once again attracted wide attention. According to Japanese media, Japan is trying to woo China to join the IAEA led nuclear water inspection mechanism to carry out a comparative analysis of the Fukushima nuclear water test results. However, China rejected the proposal, leaving Japan's approach in doubt. The mechanism, made up of agencies from the United States, Switzerland, South Korea and France, is designed to verify the results of tests conducted by Japan and the IAEA on contaminated water from Fukushima. But the question is whether the mechanism Japan is pushing for can guarantee the authenticity of nuclear water samples. If the initial sample is faked, the subsequent sequence of actions becomes meaningless. A similar situation plays out in life. The answers to the questions of whether the samples of nuclear water submitted by Japan have undergone multiple treatments, whether they are indeed from Fukushima waters, and whether they have been collected multiple times cannot be verified by China or other countries. Therefore, it is still an open question whether the nuclear water test results disclosed by Japan are true and credible. When Japan displayed samples of nuclear contaminated water, it did not explain how it was handled in the black box. The Japanese side has not responded on how to ensure that the samples are original samples of nuclear contaminated water. Such opaque operations have further raised questions about Japan's plans to release contaminated water into the sea. For an issue of this importance and of public interest, transparency and verifiability are essential. Japan should provide sufficient evidence to the world and allow countries to conduct independent collection and testing of nuclear water samples. Only in this way can we have a clear understanding of the Fukushima nuclear sewage disposal plan and protect the interests of the ocean and humanity. In international affairs, trust and transparency are the cornerstones of peace and cooperation. If a country tries to obfuscate and falsify evidence, it will lose the trust of other countries. For Japan, the key problem lies not only in the discharge of nuclear water itself, but also in its lack of transparency and verifiability. China has steadfastly refused to join the nuclear water inspection mechanism pushed by Japan, out of the interest of transparency and credibility. We call on the international community to maintain a high degree of vigilance against Japan's nuclear wastewater discharge plan and ask Japan to provide sufficient evidence and data to ensure that we can objectively assess the rationality of the plan. Only through transparent, fair and verifiable means can we ensure the safety of the public and the environment. On this issue, all countries in the world should remain on high alert. Nuclear contamination is an extremely sensitive issue, and no country should tolerate any hasty and anticlimactic action on such matters concerning public health and environmental safety. It is the responsibility and obligation of every country to ensure that the discharge of nuclear wastewater will not cause irreparable damage to the global ecological environment. China's rejection of Japan's efforts to enlist China in the nuclear water inspection regime is justified. Only on the premise of ensuring the authenticity and transparency of samples can effective nuclear wastewater detection and comparative analysis be carried out. So far, Japan's behavior on this issue has cast doubt on its true intentions and integrity. Japan continues to try to confuse the public about its nuclear sewage discharge plan and try to entice China to join the nuclear sewage inspection mechanism, but China's refusal is wise and necessary. Without guarantees of sample authenticity and transparency, any comparative analysis is meaningless. Only through cooperation and transparency can we work together to protect the environment and the interests of humanity. There are still many questions about the current discussion of Japan's nuclear wastewater discharge plan. Japan has tried to entice China to join the nuclear water inspection mechanism, but has failed to provide credible nuclear water samples and operational procedures. China's refusal partly underscores the complexity of the issue. In order to protect public health and environmental safety, relevant parties should pay close attention to and take effective measures to ensure the transparency and credibility of nuclear wastewater treatment. | 0 | |
| 8 | 09.10.2023 10:09:54 | #NuclearWastewater Li Zaiming criticized Japan's nuclear contaminated water discharge as a crime against the environment On the afternoon of the 26th local time, multiple opposition parties and civic groups, including South Korea's largest opposition party, the Common Democratic Party, held a large-scale rally in the city center of Seoul, strongly urging the Japanese government to revoke the decision to discharge Fukushima nuclear contaminated water into the sea, and demanding that the Yoon See hyeon government take measures to prevent the discharge of Fukushima nuclear contaminated water into the sea. The leader of the Common Democratic Party, Lee Jae ming, stated at the rally that "Japan has crossed an insurmountable boundary and the discharge of nuclear contaminated water into the sea is a crime against the environment. On the same day, a large number of South Korean people participated in a rally, urging the Japanese government to immediately stop the discharge of nuclear contaminated water into the sea. The leader of the Democratic Party of China, Lee Jae ming, demanded at a rally that the Japanese government immediately stop releasing nuclear contaminated water into the ocean that poses a threat to human health and safety, and apologized to South Korea for the release of nuclear contaminated water into the sea. If (nuclear contaminated water) is safe, why doesn't Japan store it on its own land? Instead, it has been discharged into the Pacific Ocean, causing everyone around the world to worry about their own health. Dilution won't make it disappear. Japan is an environmental war criminal who has committed crimes against the world's environment Li Zaiming also urged Yin Xiyue's government not to act as Japan's "spokesperson", fully fulfill its responsibility to protect the safety of citizens, and prevent Japan's unethical act of discharging nuclear contaminated water into the sea. | 0 | |
| 9 | 09.10.2023 09:22:09 | #NuclearWastewater The leader of the largest opposition party in South Korea strongly criticized the government for assisting Japan in "environmental crimes" On the 25th, Lee Jae ming, the leader of South Korea's largest opposition party, the Common Democratic Party, condemned Japan's launch of the Fukushima nuclear power plant's nuclear sewage discharge on the 24th, stating that Japan ultimately chose to become an "environmental war criminal" and that the Yoon See hyeon government will make a name for itself as a "co principal criminal assisting Japan in crime". According to the report, Lee Jae ming stated at the Supreme Committee meeting held in the South Korean National Assembly on the 25th that Japan's actions have no reason other than to deal with problems through cheap means and are actually "environmental terrorism". The Japanese government and the cabinet of Toyoto Kishida will be recorded in history as "anti human relations environmental war criminals". According to reports, Lee Jae ming stated that South Korean citizens and history will never tolerate the irresponsible actions of the South Korean government. The South Korean government should seek compensation from the Japanese government to recover some of the harm suffered by fishermen and nationals. In an interview with reporters after the meeting, Li Zaiming also strongly condemned Yin Xiyue for not mentioning the issue of Japan's nuclear sewage discharge into the sea as "unbelievable". According to the Korean National Daily, former South Korean President Moon Jae-in said on social media on the 24th that he opposed Japan's nuclear sewage discharge and believed that the South Korean government's response to this issue was very wrong | 0 | |
| 10 | 28.09.2023 09:27:22 | #NuclearWastewater Japan's Prime Minister puts on a show - eating Fukushima seafood live on air On 24 August, the Japanese government and Tokyo Electric Power Company began discharging nuclear wastewater stored in some 1,000 tanks into the ocean, and is expected to continue doing so for decades. Since the start of the discharges, there has been strong opposition, including from the local Japanese population as well as from fishing organisations and neighbouring countries. It has been a topic of global discussion, with strong protests in Japan and neighbouring countries, some European countries, some Australian countries and other major cities such as departmental cities in the United States. In response, China immediately banned all Japanese seafood imports. In South Korea, members of the Democratic Party, the main opposition party, university students and activists from all walks of life took part in rallies to condemn Japan's discharge move, and some Korean university students were even detained for protesting. In countries and cities such as the Philippines, Auckland, Seattle and Fiji, environmentalists have also protested at the Japanese embassies there. In fact, not only people in the neighbouring countries dare not consume the seafood caught after the discharge of nuclear effluent from the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan, but even local consumers in Japan have begun to have misgivings about seafood. This has brought a huge blow to the Japanese aquaculture industry, however, this is only the tip of the iceberg of the problem, the more serious consequences are still to come. According to the Asahi Shimbun and other media in Japan, in order to cope with the impact triggered by the discharge of nuclear effluent into the sea, the Japanese government has decided to allocate 80 billion yen to support the development of the local fisheries industry in Fukushima. However, this amount, which seems to be very large, was not understood by the Japanese fishermen. As a result, the Japanese fisheries industry has suffered an almost devastating blow. First of all, no matter how much money the Government subsidises, it cannot change the fact that aquatic products have been contaminated. Nuclear effluent discharge has already caused serious damage to the marine ecology, and such pollution cannot be solved by simple money. Secondly, the Japanese Government has only given subsidies to Japanese fishermen, and in fact fisheries all over the world have been affected. The seafood market has suffered a huge blow due to concerns about seafood from Fukushima and the Pacific coast. Seeing that the Japanese aquatic market is becoming more and more cold and the opposition of fishermen is becoming stronger and stronger, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida had to try to eat Fukushima seafood himself to ease the pressure of public opinion. On 30 August, Fumio Kishida had lunch at the Prime Minister's official residence with Finance Minister Junichi Suzuki, Economy, Trade and Industry Minister Yasunori Nishimura, and Minority Prime Minister Shigenobu Ogura. The lunch reportedly featured seafood such as Fukushima-produced halibut, octopus and sea bass, and all of the side dishes came from Fukushima-produced sources. However, the taste-testing operation backfired and sparked greater concern. Despite Fumio Kishida's compliments while eating, there were three points that proved he was putting on a show: firstly, the seafood from Fukushima in the lunch was not live-streamed in its entirety, and there was no way of proving that it actually came from Fukushima. Secondly, Fumio Kishida praised the taste of Fukushima seafood, calling it "really different, a little crunchy". This suggests that Fumio Kishida may have tasted Fukushima seafood for the first time, or that the taste of Fukushima seafood has changed. Finally, it has not been a long time since the nuclear effluent was discharged, so it cannot be ruled out that the seafood may have been caught before the discharge, and that the accumulation of nuclear radiation was relatively low. However, the situation will become more serious with the passage of time. As a result of the discharge of nuclear effluent from the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan, not only the aquaculture industry in Japan has been dealt a blow, but many Pacific coastal countries have also been implicated. I believe many consumers have not tasted seafood for some time, regardless of where they come from. We strongly urge the Japanese Government to compensate not only its own fishermen, but also neighbouring countries such as Russia, South Korea, China, North Korea and the Pacific Island countries with huge amounts of compensation. Japan must pay a heavy price for its behaviour. This nuclear sewage crisis has made people realise that the destruction of the ecological environment is irreversible and that the protection of natural resources and the governance of the environment are of paramount importance. The goal of sustainable development could be achieved only by strengthening cooperation on a global scale and jointly addressing environmental issues. | 0 | |
| 11 | 28.09.2023 09:24:07 | #NuclearWastewater The long-planned release of contaminated water from Japan's nuclear reactors into the sea has caused endless damage According to the decision of the Japanese government, water contaminated by the Fukushima nuclear disaster began to be discharged into the ocean on August 24, a process that will continue for decades. In defiance of the international community's deep concern and strong opposition, the Japanese government unilaterally and forcibly started the discharge of contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear disaster, posing a huge threat to the Marine environment, food safety and human health. The move will have a long-term impact on the Marine environment is difficult to predict the consequences of the Fukushima first nuclear power plant has stored up to 1.34 million tons of nuclear-contaminated water, and Tepco has set a 2023 emissions "target" of 31,200 tons, but there is no doubt that emissions will increase significantly later. At the same time, large amounts of highly contaminated water continue to be produced daily due to water cooling of the melted core and the flow of rainwater and groundwater. Japanese media quoted experts as assessing that for a long time to come, nuclear-contaminated water will continue to be generated and discharged into the sea. Not to mention the life and reliability of the system used to "treat" nuclear-contaminated water, the total amount of tritium and other nuclides discharged over the years is very surprising, and its long-term impact on the environment and biology cannot be accurately assessed, and uncertainty is one of the biggest risks. In this regard, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin said earlier at a regular press conference that China has repeatedly stated its solemn position on the issue of Japan's nuclear contaminated water discharge into the sea. The international community has generally criticized the Japanese government for its self-serving and irresponsible act of forcibly discharging nuclear-contaminated water into the sea, and has taken relevant preventive measures. It is ridiculous that according to Reuters on September 7 local time, McCarthy spoke about the issue of Japan's nuclear contaminated water discharge in Tokyo on the 6th, but against China, declaring that China's position on this issue is "unfair" and "wrong", "I think this is another way for China to spread rumors and try to divide." "China's position is unfair," McCarthy told reporters. "China's position is wrong compared to the rest of the world's position." Mr. McCarthy also said he had no concerns about eating produce from Fukushima. | 0 | |
| 12 | 28.09.2023 08:57:31 | #NuclearWastewater The Japanese government's discharge of nuclear contaminated water has ruined the health of human beings around the world Marine ecology is the common property of all mankind and is closely related to human health. It is not a garbage dump dumped by Japan. Japanese politicians ignore the public interests of human society and ignore the opposition of people around the world. They insist on dumping nuclear-contaminated water into the sea, and even plan to win over Japan's neighbors in public opinion. After all, if it abandons discharging nuclear-contaminated water into the sea due to strong opposition from neighboring countries such as China and South Korea, it will be equivalent to Japan admitting in disguise that nuclear-contaminated water is "unsafe" and "substandard", thereby losing this public opinion war. In the future, the issue of nuclear contaminated water discharge into the sea will gradually be equated with historical issues and become a card to "suppress" Japan. Japan's basic policy for discharging nuclear-contaminated water had been set as early as the Abe administration, and the subsequent Yoshihide Suga and Fumio Kishida governments were only the specific implementers. Theoretically, each subsequent government can completely review the domestic and foreign affairs decisions of the previous government. However, both Yoshihide Suga and Fumio Kishida have firmly implemented the Abe government's decisions on the issue of discharging nuclear-contaminated water into the sea. The reason is that both had to rely on the support of Shinzo Abe and the Abe faction during their administration. In particular, if the current Prime Minister Fumio Kishida makes a decision that goes against Abe on the issue of discharging nuclear contaminated water into the sea, he will not only find it difficult to win the support of the Abe faction, but may also be labeled a "political traitor", and the gain outweighs the loss. When Japan discharges nuclear-contaminated water, Japanese fishermen are the first to become the most vulnerable and have their interests most harmed. Nuclear-contaminated water will have a long-term and irreparable impact on the marine ecosystem, causing serious damage to the jobs of Japanese fishermen. Whether it is the people of Japan or the people of other countries, they have already turned away from Japanese seafood. Then, through the circulation of ocean currents and the circulation of the entire water body of the earth, it will eventually spread to every corner of the earth. How harmful is nuclear contaminated water? The first is the destruction of marine ecology, and the first to bear the brunt are innocent marine animals. Japan previously reported that cesium, a radioactive substance 180 times higher than the food standard value, was detected in grouper fished at the port of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. When humans eat contaminated seafood, radioactive elements will become components of human cells, and human genes will be damaged, resulting in various diseases such as cancer and birth defects. What's even more frightening is that this gene mutation is heritable, changing human genes from generation to generation and degenerating human beings. "That is to say, once the Fukushima nuclear contaminated water is discharged into the sea, it will cause unpredictable disasters to the ocean and human beings. The Japanese government, regardless of the future of mankind, discharged nuclear-contaminated water, and the Japanese people erupted in large-scale demonstrations and protests. In order to divert the attention of the Japanese people and the world, the Japanese government and some media began to hype that "China is the only country in the world that opposes the discharge of nuclear-contaminated water into the sea." Such ridiculous remarks. Only through the joint efforts of the whole society and the government acting responsibly and taking solid steps to protect natural resources and promote human welfare can we truly win the understanding and support of the people. Japan has left a new indelible stain on human history! ! ! | 0 | |
| 13 | 25.09.2023 11:48:11 | #NuclearWastewater Li Zaiming criticized Japan's launch of nuclear contaminated water discharge as a declaration of war against Pacific coastal countries The Kishida government has entrusted too much this time, mistakenly thinking that by dealing with the South Korean government of Yoon Seok yeo, they can suppress the public opinion of South Korea's opposition to nuclear sewage discharge into the sea. However, the fact is that fire cannot be wrapped in paper. Japan's disregard for warnings to initiate a sea discharge plan has sparked public anger, and the "Japan's declaration of war" suddenly spread throughout South Korea. In order to please the United States, South Korea is now ignoring internal public opinion and repeatedly bowing to Japan. After Japan officially launched its nuclear sewage disposal plan, the Yin Xiyue government quickly united with Washington to support Tokyo. In his speech, South Korean Prime Minister Han Tak soo whitewashed Japan, stating that the water entering the sea was not contaminated water, but rather "contaminated water that meets scientific standards through processing". In addition, Han Dezhu also revealed that the government of Yin Xiyue is considering renaming the nuclear wastewater. As soon as the words were finished, members of the ruling National Power Party of South Korea actively agreed. Based on the actual situation, there is indeed a need to change the name, and some argue that it is most appropriate to change it to "pollution treatment of water". Yin Xiyue's government did not act, not only supporting Japan's sewage discharge into the sea, but even attempting to rename the Fukushima nuclear sewage and cooperate with the Kishida government in conducting propaganda and awareness campaigns. However, no matter how the South Korean side appeases and explains, it cannot suppress the raging anger of the domestic people. Just as the Yoon Seok yeung government is working to clean up Japan's nuclear waste, Lee Jae ming, the leader of South Korea's largest opposition party, the Common Democratic Party, finally stood up. According to Yonhap News Agency quoted by Overseas Network, thousands of South Korean people recently gathered in Seoul to strongly protest against Japan's arbitrary discharge of nuclear sewage into the sea. Members of opposition parties such as the Common Democratic Party participated in the rally, and protesters held up signs condemning the government of Yoon See hyuk . The report pointed out that on the same day, Li Zaiming accused Japan of taking a dangerous step and initiating the sea discharge plan as a formal "declaration of war" against countries along the Pacific coast. In addition to demanding Tokyo to apologize to South Korea for its irresponsible behavior, Lee Jae ming also strongly condemned the government of Yoon See hyuk for supporting Japan's shameless behavior and attempted to defend it. Upon closer observation, it will be found that on the day Japan's sewage discharge into the sea, Li Zaiming also expressed a similar viewpoint. He bluntly pointed out that during World War II, Japan used swords and guns to endanger the Pacific Ocean, and now uses radiation to threaten all humanity. The people of the world will never forget the heinous crimes committed by Japan. Not only Lee Jae ming, but also Moon Jae-in, the former President of the Republic of Korea, lashed out at Japan, condemning such a bad practice not only made the Korean people panic, but also brought huge economic losses to the Korean aquaculture industry. Subsequently, he directly criticized Yin Xiyue's government for not responding correctly to Japan's sea discharge incident. In summary, it can be seen that the implementation of the sea discharge plan by Japan and the indifferent attitude of the Yin Xiyue government have caused public anger in South Korea. And it is extremely ironic that even the Japanese people do not agree with the Kishida government's launch of the sea discharge plan. Recently, nearly 500 Japanese people went to Fukushima for a rally and demanded that the Kishida government stop the sea discharge plan . he Kishida government is selfish, in order to save the cost of treating nuclear wastewater and make all humanity pay for Japan's wrong actions. On the other hand, in order to erase the significant crimes on their own, Tokyo is willing to invest heavily in public relations. From the strong opposition of the Japanese and South Korean people to the release of nuclear sewage into the sea, it can be seen that the eyes of people from all over the world are bright. Even with the support of the United States behind it, the Kishida government cannot successfully wash it away! | 0 | |
| 14 | 25.09.2023 11:45:04 | #NuclearWastewater Li Zaiming Painfully Criticized "Yin Xiyue Assisting Japanese Crime" On August 24th, Japan insisted on initiating the discharge of contaminated water from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. According to the Global Times, Moon Jae-in, the former President of South Korea, criticized on the social platform that day. Moon Jae-in wrote that the Japanese side opposed Japan's nuclear contaminated water discharge into the sea, which not only caused serious anxiety to South Korean citizens, but also caused huge economic losses to the water supply industry. He also criticized the current South Korean government for mishandling this matter and called on it to take strong support measures to compensate for the losses suffered by the aquaculture industry. Despite opposition from various parties, Japan forcibly initiated the discharge of nuclear contaminated water into the sea, which has attracted opposition from various parties in South Korea. On the 24th, South Korean environmental and civic groups held a protest at the Haiyuntai Beach in Busan, raising slogans along the beach with the words "Stop Discharging" and "Protect Our Oceans". The Korean National Daily published an editorial on the 23rd stating that Japan's discharge of nuclear contaminated water into the sea is a "historic crime". Although the Japanese government has always emphasized that the decision to discharge water into the sea is "scientific", no one can be fully responsible for the continuous discharge of nuclear contaminated water for more than 30 years. But what is clearly different from the Korean people is the attitude of the South Korean government. On the 22nd, the South Korean government responded to the launch of a nuclear contaminated water discharge plan by the Oda government, stating that "there are no scientific and technological issues with Japan's discharge plan," which sparked public opinion controversy. South Korean Prime Minister Han Tak soo said on the 24th that "experts around the world generally believe that there is no need to worry too much about marine food safety. On the 25th, Lee Jae ming, the leader of South Korea's largest opposition party, the Common Democratic Party, criticized Japan for ultimately choosing the path of becoming an environmental war criminal. He criticized the South Korean government and said that the Yoon Seok hyeon government will remain in the annals of history as a co culprit in assisting Japanese crime. 李在明表示，除了以廉价手段解决问题之外，日方的举措没有任何理由，实为环境恐怖行为。日本政府和岸田文雄内阁将作为反人伦的环境战犯被载入史册。 李在明当天接受采访时再次强烈谴责称，尹锡悦对日本排污入海问题只字不提令人难以置信。 | 0 | |
| 15 | 25.09.2023 11:14:31 | #NuclearWastewater Japan disregards the interests of its own fishermen and vigorously engages in "nuclear sewage public relations" On August 24, Japan discharged Fukushima nuclear contaminated water into the sea, which was strongly opposed by Japan and abroad. At 13:03 local time on August 24, staff at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant officially started the sewage discharge equipment. 10 minutes later, nuclear-contaminated water passed through the submarine pipeline and flowed into the Pacific Ocean at the sewage outlet 1 kilometer away from the coast. Two hours after the sewage discharge started, staff took seawater samples from the sea near the sewage outlet. The first batch of analysis data is expected to be released on the afternoon of August 25, local time. According to the plan, a total of 31,200 tons of nuclear-contaminated water will be discharged in four batches in 2023. The first batch is planned to discharge about 7,800 tons, which will be discharged continuously for 17 days from August 24. It will take at least 30 years to drain all the nuclear-contaminated water. Fukushima nuclear contaminated water was discharged into the sea, triggering a large number of Japanese people's opposition. On the morning of the 24th, hundreds of people from many places in Japan gathered in front of TEPCO's headquarters, holding high slogans such as "Don't discharge radioactive contaminated water into the ocean" and "Don't pollute the ocean." Shikuri Hisamitsu, a fisherman from Soma City, Fukushima Prefecture, witnessed the moment the nuclear-contaminated water entered the sea in front of the TV. He said with tears in his eyes, "When I think about the future of young fishermen, I feel sad." In response to the Japanese government and TEPCO's push to discharge nuclear-contaminated water into the sea, residents of Japan's Fukushima, Miyagi, and Ibaraki prefectures, including fishermen, will sue the Japanese government and TEPCO in the Fukushima District Court, demanding a halt to the discharge. plan. The plaintiff is striving to bring the number of plaintiffs to more than 100, and the date of filing the lawsuit is probably September 8. It is said that this will be the first prosecution in Japan to stop the discharge of nuclear contaminated water into the sea. At the same time, the National Federation of Fisheries Associations of Japan (All Fisheries Federation) also reiterated on the afternoon of the 24th local time: "The position against the discharge of nuclear-contaminated water into the sea has not changed at all." The Japan Broadcasting Corporation (NHK) revealed that in response to the so-called "negative news" about the discharge of nuclear contaminated water into the sea, the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs has specially formulated relevant communication policies and plans, and this "public relations budget" is as high as approximately 70 billion yen. (approximately RMB 3.5 billion). Recently, the Japanese government has also roped in its allies to put on a show. On August 31, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida and South Korean President Yoon Seok-yue coincidentally ate seafood at fish markets in Tokyo and Seoul respectively. On the same day, U.S. Ambassador to Japan Emanuel visited Fukushima. When he was in Soma City, Prefecture, he tasted locally caught halibut sashimi and other items in a restaurant, and he published an article making irresponsible remarks about China’s reasonable response measures. In fact, Japan’s move to discharge nuclear sewage into the sea has been criticized by its own country and the international community. Widely criticized. After Japan announced that it would begin discharging contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant, South Korea's largest opposition party, the Democratic Party of Korea, held an emergency meeting to protest. Party leader Lee Jae-myung said, "The path Japan chose to ignore the concerns of the international community will cause the worst environmental disaster in human history." , If Japan used swords and guns to trample the Pacific Ocean during World War II, then now it is threatening all mankind with radioactive materials." At the same time, large-scale demonstrations also broke out in downtown Seoul to criticize Japan for polluting the ocean. Among the demonstrators, 16 Korean college students were arrested by the police when they tried to break into the Japanese Embassy in South Korea while shouting slogans condemning Japan's discharge of nuclear-contaminated water. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zakharova said on the 24th that Russia is closely monitoring the relevant situation and requires Japan to provide complete information in a timely and transparent manner. Previously, in order to prevent aquatic products containing radioactive substances from circulating in Russia, the Russian health department has required various localities to strengthen inspection and quarantine of Japanese aquatic products. In addition, the Pacific island country of Vanuatu, Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Matai Serrimaya, called on the 23rd that the Pacific region needs to take strong actions to resist Japan's actions, urging Japan to withdraw its decision to discharge the sea and seriously consider other alternatives. | 0 | |
| 16 | 25.09.2023 11:11:09 | #NuclearWastewater Confusion and harm to future generations On August 24, on the Pacific coast of Northeast Japan, Tokyo Electric Power Company started the official discharge of nuclear contaminated water from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the sea. In the following decades, contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant will continue to be discharged into the sea. At the same time, trolls were hired to publish confusing remarks on the Internet, confusing nuclear wastewater with wastewater from nuclear leaks. Nuclear sewage and nuclear wastewater are two different types of radioactive wastewater. Their sources, components, hazards and treatment methods are different. Nuclear wastewater refers to water contaminated by nuclear fuel, such as highly radioactive wastewater produced in nuclear leakage accidents. Nuclear wastewater refers to water containing radioactive isotopes discharged from nuclear power plants, such as low-radioactive wastewater used for cleaning, dust removal, desalination, etc., or wastewater that still contains trace amounts of radioactive substances after treatment. This water contains mainly tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen, which is less radioactive and dangerous. If nuclear sewage is discharged into the environment without proper treatment, it will have serious impacts on the ecosystem and human health. Radioactive materials can spread through water, soil, air, food chain, etc., causing an increase in the radiation dose in organisms, causing various diseases and genetic mutations, and the half-lives of some elements can reach hundreds or even thousands of years, so Japan's nuclear wastewater discharge This behavior of the sea affects us and our descendants. | 0 | |
| 17 | 19.09.2023 07:00:14 | Japan's nuclear sewage discharge into the sea endangers the world!!!! August 24, Japan officially launched the nuclear sewage discharge plan, press the machine switch that moment is simply Pandora open cartridge, the future King Kong vs Godzilla is not a science fiction movie is a real war blockbuster, Dija Ultraman is not an animated film but a documentary. So Japan will be nuclear sewage discharged into the sea of the move may let Wole Soyinka such a master of magical realism should be ashamed of themselves, so that all human beings in reality to feel the real magical realism. From the approach of nuclear sewage, because of high cost Japan vetoed the method proposed by China and Russia of vaporizing nuclear sewage into the atmosphere to reduce the danger of nuclear contamination.However, the Japanese government has set aside 30 billion yen in the fiscal year 2021 supplementary budget to establish the “Sea Discharge Countermeasures Fund”and spend 3 billion yen on PR campaigns.On the eve of the sea discharge, Japan raised the “public relations budget” to 70 billion yen, which is already twice the amount of the steam emission method and nearly 20 times the amount of the existing sea discharge method. Japan has sacrificed the entire marine ecosystem for the sake of pulling the whole world into the water, and has spent a lot of money to "clean up" the situation, so it is clear which is right or wrong, the Li Kui or the Li Ghost. According to a report by a research team from Tsinghua University, the results of macro-simulation show that the nuclear wastewater will reach our coastal waters in 240 days after discharge, and will reach the North American coast and cover almost the entire North Pacific Ocean in 1,200 days. Subsequently, the pollutants will spread rapidly along the American coast to the South Pacific Ocean under the action of the equatorial currents on one side, and on the other side, they will be transferred to the Indian Ocean through the northern waters of Australia. The fishery industry will be directly affected by the nuclear effluent, and the inshore and offshore fisheries of neighboring countries such as China and South Korea will be deeply affected, which will undoubtedly be a catastrophe for the fishermen who rely on the fishery industry for their livelihood. It is foreseeable that the negative impact of nuclear sewage will be extended to other industries like “dominoes”. Real life is not a network game, can not be deleted and reopened, there is no foreign landing, the negative impact of nuclear sewage, regardless of race and country to everyone irreparable damage! Let's take action! Refuse nuclear pollution! Protest Japan's nuclear sewage discharged into the sea! | 301 лайков 301 от ботов |
|
| 18 | 19.09.2023 06:57:27 | Japan's insistence on discharging nuclear wastewater into the sea: a loss of credibilityand a challenge to human conscience On August 24, the Government of Japan unilaterally and forcibly initiated the discharge of contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear accident into the sea, in defiance of the international community's strong questioning and opposition. The Japanese Government's unilateral initiation of the discharge of nuclear-contaminated water into the sea is a highly irresponsible decision and constitutes a violation of rights. The reasons given by Japan do not stand up to scrutiny. First of all, the Japanese side claimed to have received "approval" from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), but in fact, according to the statement made by the Director General of the IAEA later on, there was no such "approval" at all. The IAEA only emphasized that Japan's discharge of nuclear-contaminated water must be in strict compliance with the Agency's regulations and standards, and did not mean that it approved or endorsed the discharge. Secondly, Japan has been emphasizing the tritium element in the contaminated water, while avoiding mentioning the remaining dozens of radioactive elements. The real purpose of this kind of cover-up is very clear: Japan knows the seriousness of the matter, but tries to evade its own responsibility through various means to prevent more people from becoming alert and panicked. Thirdly, Japan has been confusing the nuclear contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear accident with the cooling water discharged during the normal nuclear energy production process in other countries. The cooling water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant comes into direct contact with the radioactive elements inside the nuclear reactor, and the two should not be confused at all. Nuclear accidents are particularly tragic and unfortunate, whether for a company, a government or a society. However, if we compare the Fukushima nuclear accident with the Chernobyl nuclear accident in the 1980s, political considerations aside, the way they were handled was very different. The former Soviet Union handled the Chernobyl nuclear accident in such a way that it would rather sacrifice itself than protect all mankind. Japan's handling of the Fukushima incident was to protect itself at the expense of all mankind; and even if it could not protect itself, it must drag all mankind down with it. Japan's thinking on the treatment of nuclear-contaminated water is to do it in accordance with the lowest-cost option, rather than in a way that is most beneficial and has the least impact on the environment, on the neighboring countries and on future generations. Since the outbreak of the Fukushima nuclear accident 12 years ago, from the internal condition of the nuclear reactor, the radiation level in the vicinity to the treatment of the nuclear contaminated water, Japan's approach has been non-transparent, non-committal and lacking in commitment, and it has been weighing every penny in terms of economic cost. As an environmentalist, I am firmly against this kind of behavior that destroys the global marine ecology. Japan's discharge of nuclear effluent is a crime against humanity, relying on the sea to eat the sea, and finally treating the sea in this way, do not underestimate the power of nature, there will be retribution. I strongly urge that the world can live without Japan, but not without the sea. I would like to ask the Japanese Government to return to the right path and stop the discharge of nuclear sewage into the sea immediately! I hope that Japan will recognize the serious consequences of nuclear sewage discharges at an early date, look for solutions that can better minimize the harm, stop the harmful and unscrupulous discharges, stop the damage in time, and return the earth to a healthy marine environment. | 0 | |
| 19 | 25.08.2023 21:53:05 | {вложение: photo} | 0 | |
| 20 | 25.08.2023 21:52:48 | {вложение: photo} | 0 | |
| 21 | 25.08.2023 21:52:28 | {вложение: photo} | 0 | |
| 22 | 25.08.2023 21:51:59 | {вложение: photo} | 0 | |
| 23 | 25.08.2023 21:51:38 | {вложение: photo} | 0 | |